Coral Harbor Rehabilitation v. NLRB
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 18-2220
CORAL HARBOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER,
Petitioner
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
No. 18-2619
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,
Petitioner
v.
CORAL HARBOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER, Respondent
(NLRB-1 No. 22-CA-167738)
Present: McKEE, PORTER and ROTH, Circuit Judges
1. Letter Motion by Intervenor-Respondent at No. 18-2220, 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, to Correct the Court’s Opinion Entered on December 26, 2019.
Respectfully,
Clerk/slc
_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing Motion is Granted.
The opinion is to be amended as follows:
Counsel for Intervenor, 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East (“the Union”)
Jessica E. Harris, Esq., should be added.
Page 12 delete NLRB v. Vista Nursing, and replace with NLRB v. New Vista Nursing.
By the Court,
s/ Theodore A. McKee
Circuit Judge
Dated: January 6, 2020 SLC/cc: Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation v. NLRB (Coral Harbor Rehabilitation v. NLRB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.