Cora v. Cora

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cora v. Cora

652 So. 2d 1226, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3458, 1995 WL 144274

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 1995

DocketNo. 94-218

StatusPublished

This text of 652 So. 2d 1226 (Cora v. Cora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cora v. Cora, 652 So. 2d 1226, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3458, 1995 WL 144274 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (In a non-jury case, it is the trial court’s duty to reconcile conflicts in the testimony, to judge the credibility of witnesses, and to determine the weight of the evidence presented, therefore, where there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings, this court will not disturb the same on appeal.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (In a non-jury case, it is the trial court’s duty to reconcile conflicts in the testimony, to judge the credibility of witnesses, and to determine the weight of the evidence presented, therefore, where there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings, this court will not disturb the same on appeal.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 1226, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3458, 1995 WL 144274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cora-v-cora-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack