Coquille v. Expressway Bowling, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Coquille v. Expressway Bowling, Inc.

172 So. 2d 295, 247 La. 492

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 15, 1965

DocketNo. 47666

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 295 (Coquille v. Expressway Bowling, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coquille v. Expressway Bowling, Inc., 172 So. 2d 295, 247 La. 492 (La. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

In re: Richard J. Coquille and Mrs. Mamie Perrien Coquille, his wife, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

HAWTHORNE, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs and assigns reasons. SUMMERS, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs for the reasons assigned by HAWTHORNE, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Richard J. Coquille and Mrs. Mamie Perrien Coquille, his wife, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

HAWTHORNE, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs and assigns reasons. SUMMERS, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs for the reasons assigned by HAWTHORNE, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 295, 247 La. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coquille-v-expressway-bowling-inc-la-1965.