Coppola v. Kings Highway Associates
625 A.2d 847, 31 Conn. App. 919, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 245
This text of 625 A.2d 847 (Coppola v. Kings Highway Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coppola v. Kings Highway Associates, 625 A.2d 847, 31 Conn. App. 919, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 245 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
We have thoroughly examined the record and briefs in this matter and find this appeal to be without merit.
The judgment rendered on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
625 A.2d 847, 31 Conn. App. 919, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppola-v-kings-highway-associates-connappct-1993.