Coppola Construction Company, Inc. v. Hoffman Enterprises Limited Partnership
This text of 41 A.3d 663 (Coppola Construction Company, Inc. v. Hoffman Enterprises Limited Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COPPOLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
v.
HOFFMAN ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Richard P. Weinstein, West Hartford, and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition.
Fletcher C. Thomson, Hartford, in opposition.
The petition by the defendant Jeffrey S. Hoffman for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 203, 38 A.3d 215, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had stated a legally sufficient claim for negligent misrepresentation?"
PALMER and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.3d 663, 304 Conn. 923, 2012 WL 1667601, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppola-construction-company-inc-v-hoffman-enterprises-limited-conn-2012.