Coppins v. Lowe
This text of 103 N.Y.S. 1120 (Coppins v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s horse was run over by a wagon and injured. The only question was as to whether or not the wagon was that of defendant. On the first trial the jury found for defendant, and the court set aside the verdict. The defendant appealed, and the order was affirmed. At the next trial the jury found for plaintiff for $375, that being the conceded damages. Again the court set aside the verdict. There was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, and it was error for the court to interfere with the conclusion reached by them. The order should be reversed, and the verdict reinstated, with appropriate costs in the court below and costs of the appeal in this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppins-v-lowe-nyappterm-1907.