Coppins v. Lowe

103 N.Y.S. 1120
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 10, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 103 N.Y.S. 1120 (Coppins v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coppins v. Lowe, 103 N.Y.S. 1120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff’s horse was run over by a wagon and injured. The only question was as to whether or not the wagon was that of defendant. On the first trial the jury found for defendant, and the court set aside the verdict. The defendant appealed, and the order was affirmed. At the next trial the jury found for plaintiff for $375, that being the conceded damages. Again the court set aside the verdict. There was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, and it was error for the court to interfere with the conclusion reached by them. The order should be reversed, and the verdict reinstated, with appropriate costs in the court below and costs of the appeal in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppins-v-lowe-nyappterm-1907.