Coppersmith v. . Cook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Coppersmith v. . Cook

144 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 799, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 397

DecidedSeptember 19, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 923 (Coppersmith v. . Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coppersmith v. . Cook, 144 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 799, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 397 (N.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, to determine the liability of the Warrenton Grocery Company for the debts of R. L. Cook, either as partner or principal and agent.

From a judgment exculpating the said Warrenton Grocery Company from liability for the debts of R. L. Cook upon the facts agreed, the plaintiff appeals, assigning error. The judgment is correct. The case would be valueless as a precedent, hence the facts are not stated and no opinion will be written, other than this memorandum.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, to determine the liability of the Warrenton Grocery Company for the debts of R. L. Cook, either as partner or principal and agent.

From a judgment exculpating the said Warrenton Grocery Company from liability for the debts of R. L. Cook upon the facts agreed, the plaintiff appeals, assigning error. The judgment is correct. The case would be valueless as a precedent, hence the facts are not stated and no opinion will be written, other than this memorandum.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 799, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppersmith-v-cook-nc-1928.