Copper King v. Johnson

195 U.S. 627, 25 S. Ct. 793, 49 L. Ed. 351, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 676
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 12, 1904·No. No. 356·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Rio Grande, etc., Company, v. Gildersleeve, 174 U. S. 603, 609; Sparrow v. Strong, 4 Wall. 584; Kerr v, Clampitt, 95 U. S. 188. Revised Statutes of Arizona (1901), sections 1214, 1389, 1493, 4104.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copper King v. Johnson, 195 U.S. 627, 25 S. Ct. 793, 49 L. Ed. 351, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 676 (1904).

195 U.S. 627 (Copper King v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shults Bread Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 268 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)