Coppage v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Coppage v. State

2017 ND 279, 904 N.W.2d 34

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 7, 2017

Docket20170277

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 279 (Coppage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coppage v. State, 2017 ND 279, 904 N.W.2d 34 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Ernest Coppage appeals from a district court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Coppage argues the district court erred in summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective and the district court judge should have recused herself. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Ernest Coppage appeals from a district court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Coppage argues the district court erred in summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective and the district court judge should have recused herself. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 279, 904 N.W.2d 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppage-v-state-nd-2017.