Coppa v. Doherty

2022 Ohio 4059
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 2022
Docket2022-P-0045
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 Ohio 4059 (Coppa v. Doherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coppa v. Doherty, 2022 Ohio 4059 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

[Cite as Coppa v. Doherty, 2022-Ohio-4059.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY

NICHOLAS E. COPPA, CASE NO. 2022-P-0045

Relator, Original Action for Writ of Mandamus - vs -

JUDGE BECKY L. DOHERTY,

Respondent.

PER CURIAM OPINION

Decided: November 14, 2022 Judgment: Dismissed

Nicholas E. Coppa, pro se, Portage County Justice Center, 8240 Infirmary Road, Ravenna, OH 44266 (Relator).

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Respondent).

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Pending before this court is relator, Nicholas E. Coppa’s, Complaint for Writ

of Mandamus filed on August 19, 2022. Coppa asks this Court to either vacate his

sentence or order his resentencing in State v. Coppa, Portage C.P. No. 2020CR00566,

and require “the judge * * * to justify why consecutive sentences were necessary.”

{¶2} “At the time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal against a

government entity or employee, the inmate shall file with the court an affidavit that

contains a description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five years in any state or federal court.” R.C. 2969.25(A). “The

requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects

an inmate’s action to dismissal.” State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-

Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5.

{¶3} An original action for mandamus filed in the court of appeals is considered

a “civil action” for the purposes of R.C. 2969.25(A). State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnell,

126 Ohio St.3d 511, 2010-Ohio-4726, 935 N.E.2d 830, ¶ 3; State ex rel. Hawk v. Athens

Cty., 106 Ohio St.3d 183, 2005-Ohio-4383, 833 N.E.2d 296, ¶ 3.

{¶4} At the time Coppa filed his Complaint, he was an inmate at the Portage

County Jail. Coppa did not attach the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) to his

Complaint. Accordingly, Coppa’s Complaint is dismissed. State ex rel. McDougald v.

Greene, 155 Ohio St.3d 216, 2018-Ohio-4200, 120 N.E.3d 779, ¶ 6 (“[w]e [the Ohio

Supreme Court] have consistently affirmed the judgments of courts of appeals dismissing

inmates’ civil suits against the government when the complaints or petitions have not

included a complete affidavit of prior actions”); State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Bur. of Sentence

Computation, 166 Ohio St.3d 497, 2022-Ohio-236, 187 N.E.3d 526, ¶ 19.

{¶5} Complaint dismissed.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J., MATT LYNCH, J., JOHN J. EKLUND, J., concur.

Case No. 2022-P-0045

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnell
2010 Ohio 4726 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
The State Ex Rel. McDougald v. Greene.
2018 Ohio 4200 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
State ex rel. White v. Bechtel
99 Ohio St. 3d 11 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Hawk v. Athens County
106 Ohio St. 3d 183 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 Ohio 4059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coppa-v-doherty-ohioctapp-2022.