Copp v. Mead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Copp v. Mead

2 A.D.2d 873, 154 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4484

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 30, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 873 (Copp v. Mead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Copp v. Mead, 2 A.D.2d 873, 154 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the town board of the Town of Lewisboro, Westchester County, which granted an application for a permit to excavate and remove sand, gravel and other subsoil from property situate in said town. Petitioners, who are adjoining landowners, appeal from so much of an order as dismisses the petition. Respondents cross-appeal from so much of said order as denies their motion to strike out portions of the reply. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants. Cross appeal dismissed as academic, without costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the town board of the Town of Lewisboro, Westchester County, which granted an application for a permit to excavate and remove sand, gravel and other subsoil from property situate in said town. Petitioners, who are adjoining landowners, appeal from so much of an order as dismisses the petition. Respondents cross-appeal from so much of said order as denies their motion to strike out portions of the reply. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants. Cross appeal dismissed as academic, without costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 873, 154 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copp-v-mead-nyappdiv-1956.