Copernico v. Copernico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Copernico v. Copernico

67 A.D.2d 975, 413 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 975 (Copernico v. Copernico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Copernico v. Copernico, 67 A.D.2d 975, 413 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 22, 1978, which, upon renewal and reconsideration, adhered to the original determination granting custody of the parties’ son to his father and custody of their daughter to the mother. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding to determine both custody and child support. Under the circumstances presented in this case, the order appealed from is not a final order of disposition and permission to appeal has not been granted. In any event, the evidence which the parties would have us review is, by now, stale. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone, Suozzi and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 22, 1978, which, upon renewal and reconsideration, adhered to the original determination granting custody of the parties’ son to his father and custody of their daughter to the mother. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding to determine both custody and child support. Under the circumstances presented in this case, the order appealed from is not a final order of disposition and permission to appeal has not been granted. In any event, the evidence which the parties would have us review is, by now, stale. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone, Suozzi and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 975, 413 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copernico-v-copernico-nyappdiv-1979.