Copelco Leasing Corp. v. Besi Photo Shop, Inc.
This text of 678 So. 2d 17 (Copelco Leasing Corp. v. Besi Photo Shop, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal of a sua sponte order vacating a summary final judgment. The trial court based its ruling on the erroneous conclusion that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to a “venue selection” clause in an equipment lease. We reverse and remand to the trial court to reinstate the summary final judgment. A forum selection clause does not oust a court of its jurisdiction; it merely provides a court with a reason to refrain from exercising its jurisdiction. Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437, 440 (Fla.1986); see M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972). Appellees waived any objection to the case being heard in Florida where they submitted to the court’s jurisdiction by admitting in their answer that Broward County was the appropriate venue. See Cumberland Software, Inc. v. Great American Mortgage Corp., 507 So.2d 794, 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 So. 2d 17, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8920, 1996 WL 471078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copelco-leasing-corp-v-besi-photo-shop-inc-fladistctapp-1996.