Copeland v. Warden
598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 926, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 474
Opinion
The petitioner David Copeland’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 10, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“After a defendant has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, does the trial court have the authority to impose a criminal sentence consecutive to the defendant’s psychiatric commitment?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Copeland v. Warden, 598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 926, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 474 (Colo. 1991).
598 A.2d 365 (Copeland v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Copeland v. Warden, State Prison
621 A.2d 1311 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)