Copeland v. UTDC Transit Services, Inc.

788 So. 2d 401, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9164, 2001 WL 746923
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-3492
StatusPublished

This text of 788 So. 2d 401 (Copeland v. UTDC Transit Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Copeland v. UTDC Transit Services, Inc., 788 So. 2d 401, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9164, 2001 WL 746923 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Martin v. Rivers, 72 So.2d 789, 791-92 (Fla.1954) (The operator of the train “had the right, from the facts in the record here, to believe that the deceased was in possession of his faculties and his normal senses, and that with all of the signals of danger, the extent of which were almost overwhelming, he would not walk directly into the path of a moving train.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Rivers
72 So. 2d 789 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
788 So. 2d 401, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9164, 2001 WL 746923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-utdc-transit-services-inc-fladistctapp-2001.