Copeland v. UTDC Transit Services, Inc.
788 So. 2d 401, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9164, 2001 WL 746923
Opinion
Affirmed. Martin v. Rivers, 72 So.2d 789, 791-92 (Fla.1954) (The operator of the train “had the right, from the facts in the record here, to believe that the deceased was in possession of his faculties and his normal senses, and that with all of the signals of danger, the extent of which were almost overwhelming, he would not walk directly into the path of a moving train.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Copeland v. UTDC Transit Services, Inc., 788 So. 2d 401, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9164, 2001 WL 746923 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
788 So. 2d 401 (Copeland v. UTDC Transit Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Rivers
72 So. 2d 789 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)