Copeland v. United Transp. Union
This text of 819 F.2d 1142 (Copeland v. United Transp. Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ronald COPELAND; Sammy Lee Copeland; Dean S. D'Annunzio;
Henry Espinosa; Thomas E. Gavle; Gregory K. Georgeff;
Joseph Gibson, Jr.; Brian T. Gorney; William Russell
Haskins; Edward L. King; Gerald R. Ohneck, Jr.; Steven
Sarkozi; Donnie H. Slone; Walter Sulowski; and John
Waite, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86-1624.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 8, 1987.
Before KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the order of the Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Upon review of the briefs of the parties, oral argument and the record, we AFFIRM the district court's order for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion and order dated June 25, 1986.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
819 F.2d 1142, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7257, 1987 WL 37597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-united-transp-union-ca6-1987.