Copeland v. State

164 S.W.2d 667, 144 Tex. Crim. 473, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 384
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 1942·No. No. 22181.·Published

Opinions

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of property of the value of more than $50.00. Punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception are found in the record. The statement of facts shows that appellant and his brother-in-law, *474 Alton Covill, stole the truck casings, tubes and rims from Lloyd Odom, and that appellant, in company with someone unknown to Mr. Page, sold to him the property in question. The theft occurred in Martin County. Later the property was found in the possession of Mr. Page in Big Spring, Howard County. The. property was recovered and identified. On the trial appellant testified that he sold the property for his brother-in-law, but denied knowledge that it was stolen. At a former term of court he had sworn in an application for continuance that he (appellant) had purchased the property and gave the names of two witnesses by whom he could prove said purchase. On the present trial he admitted that what he had sworn in said application was untrue.

Under the facts it is not surprising that the jury did not give credence to his story.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copeland v. State, 164 S.W.2d 667, 144 Tex. Crim. 473, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 384 (Tex. 1942).

164 S.W.2d 667 (Copeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.