Copeland v. State
748 So. 2d 317, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14815, 1999 WL 1015981
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Copeland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 756 So. 2d 180 →
Opinion
The order denying postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed. As to the first issue, see State v. Altman, 432 So.2d 159, 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). As to the third issue, see Hunt v. State, 330 So.2d 502, 503-04 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). The fourth issue was decided in appellant’s direct appeal.
We take judicial notice of the briefs in appellant’s direct appeal from his conviction, Copeland v. State, 717 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Copeland v. State, 748 So. 2d 317, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14815, 1999 WL 1015981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
748 So. 2d 317 (Copeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Altman
432 So. 2d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Hunt v. State
330 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)