Copeland v. State

411 So. 2d 912
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1982·No. No. 82-255·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant raising the issues again in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. The motion appealed from was insufficient on its face. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(a-e).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and OTT and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copeland v. State, 411 So. 2d 912 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 912 (Copeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Harrington
411 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)