Copeland v. State

601 So. 2d 1112, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 464, 1992 WL 171679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Copeland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 130
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 24, 1992·No. CR-90-1352·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this cause to the trial court with instructions to forward to the appellant the forms necessary to file a Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition, asserting the claims he had sought to raise by way of petition for writ of habeas corpus. 601 So.2d 1110 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). According to the trial court’s return, the appellant has been instructed to obtain the Rule 32 form from the department of corrections and to file it with the trial court within 30 days. Because the appellant will have an opportunity to present his claims to the trial court, this cause is due to be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copeland v. State, 601 So. 2d 1112, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 464, 1992 WL 171679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 1112 (Copeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Copeland v. State
601 So. 2d 1110 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)