Copeland v. Smith
This text of 16 F.3d 409 (Copeland v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Terry Wendell COPELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Warden; Sewall B. Smith, Warden; Ronald
Hutchinson, Assistant Warden; R. Singletary, Security
Chief; James Murphy, Security Chief; Waverly E. Ray,
Major; Marvin Diggs, Major; Lieutenant Troy; Sergeant
Perkins; R. Reichlyn, Captain; T. Purnell, Security Chief;
Captain Wouldridge, Jr.; Mrs. Wouldridge; Captain
Tuthill, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-7042.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-2485).
Terry Wendell Copeland, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Copeland v. Smith, No. CA-93-2485 (D. Md. Sept. 8, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.3d 409, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7267, 1994 WL 4687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-smith-ca4-1994.