Copeland v. Shrom

Fourth Circuit

Copeland v. Shrom

588 F. App'x 238

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. No. 14-7044·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as time-barred. The district court has granted Copeland’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, vacated its dismissed order, and the complaint reinstated. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as time-barred. The district court has granted Copeland’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, vacated its dismissed order, and the complaint reinstated. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Copeland v. Shrom, 588 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 238 (Copeland v. Shrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related