Copeland v. Shrom
This text of 588 F. App'x 238 (Copeland v. Shrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as time-barred. The district court has granted Copeland’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, vacated its dismissed order, and the complaint reinstated. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
588 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-shrom-ca4-2014.