Copeland v. Rogers

82 So. 748, 78 Fla. 88
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 82 So. 748 (Copeland v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Copeland v. Rogers, 82 So. 748, 78 Fla. 88 (Fla. 1919).

Opinion

West, J.

— This is a suit brought by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside a deed of conveyance for certain real [89]*89estate made by the bankrupt to Ms wife on the ground that such conveyance was without consideration, that it was executed of covin and collusion by the parties thereto for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of the bankrupt and that such conveyance is therefore fraudulent and void.

The material allegations of the bill of complaint are denied by the answer of the defendants. After the taking of testimony there was a decree for the complainant.

Upon this appeal the contention is that inasmuch as it appears that the conveyance was executed more than four months before the date of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy that the complainant can not prevail. This court has expressly held to the contrary of this contention, and there being ample evidence in the record to support the decree it is affirmed upon the authority of Beazley v. Coggins, 48 Fla. 215, 37 South. Rep. 213.

Affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and Whitfield, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilmore v. Ragans
503 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kemp v. Kemp
485 N.E.2d 663 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1985)
Williams v. Williams
255 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
North Shore Bank v. Shea
148 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Josephson v. Kuhner
139 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Chase Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Sullivan
127 So. 2d 112 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Spark v. Canny
88 So. 2d 307 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Railway Express Agency v. Huntress ex rel. Royal Ins. Co.
51 A.2d 379 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1947)
Heller v. Commissioner
41 B.T.A. 1020 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lawson
110 F.2d 269 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
New York Liff Insurance Co. v. Oates, Et Ux.
192 So. 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Wood v. Wood
49 P.2d 416 (Utah Supreme Court, 1935)
Fleshman v. Bank of Marlinton
173 S.E. 775 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1934)
Collins v. Collins' Administrator
45 S.W.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Peters' Administrator v. Peters
6 S.W.2d 499 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Clark v. Bridges
136 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 748, 78 Fla. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-rogers-fla-1919.