Copeland v. McDonough Construction Co. of Florida

204 So. 2d 732
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 13, 1967
DocketNo. 36466
StatusPublished

This text of 204 So. 2d 732 (Copeland v. McDonough Construction Co. of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Copeland v. McDonough Construction Co. of Florida, 204 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross-petition we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 20,1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is also denied. The Petition for attorneys’ fees filed by Petitioner Copeland is granted in the sum of $250.00 for successful defense against the cross-petition.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 So. 2d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-mcdonough-construction-co-of-florida-fla-1967.