Copeland v. Hurley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 30, 2005
• Docket: 05-6291
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6291

TERRY WENDELL COPELAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT J. HURLEY, Forensic Scientist; STEVEN E. HARRIS; NANCY S. FORSTER; ROBERT F. BARRY; MICHAEL R. BRAUDES; SCOTT WHITNEY; THOMAS A. KENNEDY; CAROL E. CHANCE; HOWARD MARGULIES; KEVIN P. CLARK; JAMES W. HAGIN, JR., Detective Sergeant; RONALD A. KARASIC; JOHN MERTEN, F.B.I. Agent; RONALD LAMARTINA, Detective Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-05- 10-AMD)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 30, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Wendell Copeland, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Terry Wendell Copeland appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Copeland v. Hurley, No. CA-05-10-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 7, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -