Copeland v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.
61 Barb. 60, 1871 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 127
Opinion
The lease was invalid, and the action properly brought by a stockholder, on behalf of himself and other stockholders. The justice committed no error [78]*78in refusing to adjust the equities between the two defendants, as they were not embraced in the pleadings containing the issues which were tried, and they may be the subject of another action. t
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Miller, P. J., and Parker and Daniels, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Copeland v. Citizens' Gas Light Co., 61 Barb. 60, 1871 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 127 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1871).
61 Barb. 60 (Copeland v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parsons v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.
65 P. 765 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)
People v. Ballard
8 N.Y.S. 918 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Astor v. Westchester Gas-Light Co.
40 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 333 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Sheldon Hat Blocking Co. v. Eickmeyer Hat Blocking Co.
56 How. Pr. 70 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)