Copeland v. Amward Homes of N.C., Inc.
This text of Copeland v. Amward Homes of N.C., Inc. (Copeland v. Amward Homes of N.C., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
2021-NCSC-118
No. 56PA20
Filed 29 October 2021
WILLIAM EVERETT COPELAND IV and CATHERINE ASHLEY F. COPELAND, Co-Administrators of the ESTATE OF WILLIAM EVERETT COPELAND
v.
AMWARD HOMES OF N.C., INC.; CRESCENT COMMUNITIES, LLC; and CRESCENT HILLSBOROUGH, LLC
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision
of the Court of Appeals, 269 N.C. App. 143, 837 S.E.2d 903 (2020), reversing and
remanding an order of summary judgment entered on 7 May 2018 by Judge W.
Osmond Smith III in Superior Court, Orange County. On 15 December 2020, the
Supreme Court allowed plaintiffs’ conditional petition for discretionary review. Heard
in the Supreme Court on 1 September 2021.
Edwards Kirby, LLP, by William B. Bystrynski and David F. Kirby, and Holt Sherlin LLP, by C. Mark Holt and David L. Sherlin, for plaintiffs.
Cranfill Sumner LLP, by Steven A. Bader and F. Marshall Wall, for defendants Crescent Communities, LLC, and Crescent Hillsborough, LLC.
Pinto Coates Kyre & Bowers, PLLC, by Jon Ward, and Erwin Byrd for Amicus Curiae North Carolina Advocates for Justice.
Roberts & Stevens, PA, by David C. Hawisher, for Amicus Curiae North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.
PER CURIAM. COPELAND V. AMWARD HOMES OF N.C., INC.
Opinion of the Court
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Copeland v. Amward Homes of N.C., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/copeland-v-amward-homes-of-nc-inc-nc-2021.