Cope v. State
792 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2001 WL 988044
This text of 792 So. 2d 1242 (Cope v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cope v. State, 792 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2001 WL 988044 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
We affirm the denial of Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief because the motion was not timely. See Regan v. State, 787 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. State
781 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Booker v. State
771 So. 2d 1187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Buckingham v. State
771 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Regan v. State
787 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Latiif v. State
787 So. 2d 834 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
792 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2001 WL 988044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cope-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.