Cope v. State

792 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2001 WL 988044
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2001·No. No. 1D01-130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief because the motion was not timely. See Regan v. State, 787 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).1

MINER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cope v. State, 792 So. 2d 1242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2001 WL 988044 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 1242 (Cope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
781 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Booker v. State
771 So. 2d 1187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Buckingham v. State
771 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Regan v. State
787 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Latiif v. State
787 So. 2d 834 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)