Cope v. State Bank of Commerce

1922 OK 74, 205 P. 131, 85 Okla. 203, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 64
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 7, 1922·No. 11288·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from .an order discharging a temporary injunction, but not filed in this court within 30 days from the date of the order appealed from. The order was made December 20, \1919, and appeal filed in this court March 27, 1921.

Under section 5266, Revised Laws of 1910, this court is without jurisdiction over the subject-matter. Herring et al. v. Wiggins, 7 Okla. 312, 54 Pac. 483; Pioneer Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Inc. Town of Chelsea, 23 Okla. 720, 102 Pac. 83; White v. Hooker et al., 47 Okla. 453, 148 Pac. 719; Harn v. Oklahoma City et al., 43 Okla. 501, 148 Pac. 1040; Orr et al. v. City of Cushing, 66 Okla. 153, 168 Pac. 223.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cope v. State Bank of Commerce, 1922 OK 74, 205 P. 131, 85 Okla. 203, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 64 (Okla. 1922).

1922 OK 74 (Cope v. State Bank of Commerce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Hooker
1915 OK 87 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Herring v. Wiggins
1898 OK 60 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1898)
Harn v. Oklahoma City
1912 OK 359 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Orr v. City of Cushing
1917 OK 477 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Incorporated Town of Chelsea
1909 OK 120 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)