Cope v. Cope

Utah Supreme Court

Cope v. Cope

7 Utah 63

DecidedJune 15, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Utah 63 (Cope v. Cope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cope v. Cope, 7 Utah 63 (Utah 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Henderson, J.:

The questions in this case are the same as those in the ■case of Chapman v. Handley, ante, 49, in which opinions have just been handed down. The cause was heard in the district court by Justice Anderson, and Chief Justice Zane was of counsel, as will be seen by the opinions just handed down in the Handley Case. We are unable to agree, and therefore the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Blackburn, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson, J.:

The questions in this case are the same as those in the ■case of Chapman v. Handley, ante, 49, in which opinions have just been handed down. The cause was heard in the district court by Justice Anderson, and Chief Justice Zane was of counsel, as will be seen by the opinions just handed down in the Handley Case. We are unable to agree, and therefore the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Blackburn, J., dissented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Utah 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cope-v-cope-utah-1890.