Cope v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Cope v. Anderson

1916 OK 689, 157 P. 939, 59 Okla. 176, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1168

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 20, 1916

Docket7450

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 689 (Cope v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cope v. Anderson, 1916 OK 689, 157 P. 939, 59 Okla. 176, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1168 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The plaintiffs in error, C. K. Leslie and O. R. Hammer, are the only two parties appearing to prosecute this cause in this court, and are the only parties for whom any briefs have been filed herein, and the aforesaid parties and the defendants in error have heretofore entered into a stipution which virtually disposes of the merits of the controversy here. This court, having considered this record and the stipulation of the parties aforesaid, hereby dismisses this appeal as to J. L. Cope and Tesley Cope, for want of prosecution, as said parties have not briefed said cause nor made application for time to do so, and the af>peal as to them is hereby treated as having been abandoned. This appeal as to C. K. Leslie and O. R. Hammer is hereby affirmed in all things, except that this court disapproves of the finding of facts and judgment of the court as to all allegations of fraud perpetrated by C. K. Leslie and O. R. Hammer in the taking of their ■deed to the land in controversy from Tesley Cope, and this judgment appealed from is modified to that extent, but in all other things is affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The plaintiffs in error, C. K. Leslie and O. R. Hammer, are the only two parties appearing to prosecute this cause in this court, and are the only parties for whom any briefs have been filed herein, and the aforesaid parties and the defendants in error have heretofore entered into a stipution which virtually disposes of the merits of the controversy here. This court, having considered this record and the stipulation of the parties aforesaid, hereby dismisses this appeal as to J. L. Cope and Tesley Cope, for want of prosecution, as said parties have not briefed said cause nor made application for time to do so, and the af>peal as to them is hereby treated as having been abandoned. This appeal as to C. K. Leslie and O. R. Hammer is hereby affirmed in all things, except that this court disapproves of the finding of facts and judgment of the court as to all allegations of fraud perpetrated by C. K. Leslie and O. R. Hammer in the taking of their ■deed to the land in controversy from Tesley Cope, and this judgment appealed from is modified to that extent, but in all other things is affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 689, 157 P. 939, 59 Okla. 176, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cope-v-anderson-okla-1916.