COP v. Philip Morris, Inc.
This text of COP v. Philip Morris, Inc. (COP v. Philip Morris, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 691 EAL 2015 BY KATHLEEN G. KANE, ATTORNEY : GENERAL, : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioner : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v. : : : PHILIP MORRIS, INC.; RJ REYNOLDS : TOBACCO COMPANY; BROWN & : WILLIAMSON TOBACCO : CORPORATION; B.A.T. INDUSTRIES, : PLC; THE AMERICAN TOBACCO : COMPANY, INC.; C/O BROWN & : WILLIAMSON TOBACCO : CORPORATION; LORILLARD TOBACCO : COMPANY; LIGGETT GROUP, INC.; : UNITED STATES TOBACCO COMPANY; : THE TOBACCO INSTITUTE, INC.; THE : COUNCIL FOR TOBACCO RESEARCH : U.S.A., INC.; SMOKELESS TOBACCO : COUNCIL, INC., AND HILL & : KNOWLTON, INC., : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
COP v. Philip Morris, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cop-v-philip-morris-inc-pa-2016.