Coopey v. Coopey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coopey v. Coopey

53 A.D.2d 600, 385 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13263

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 600 (Coopey v. Coopey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coopey v. Coopey, 53 A.D.2d 600, 385 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated August 1, 1975, she appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much thereof as awarded her (1) alimony in the amount of "$30 bi-weekly” and (2) child support in the amount of "$100 bi-weekly”. Judgment modified, on the facts, by increasing [601]*601the award of alimony to $100 every two weeks. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances of this case, the award of alimony was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated August 1, 1975, she appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much thereof as awarded her (1) alimony in the amount of "$30 bi-weekly” and (2) child support in the amount of "$100 bi-weekly”. Judgment modified, on the facts, by increasing [601]*601the award of alimony to $100 every two weeks. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances of this case, the award of alimony was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 600, 385 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coopey-v-coopey-nyappdiv-1976.