Cooper v. Whatcom County
Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON JESSE G. COOPER, et al., CASE NO. C19-1684-JCC Plaintiffs, ORDER v. WHATCOM COUNTY, et al., Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion for leave for Defendant PeaceHealth to amend its answer (Dkt. No. 58). Plaintiffs consent to the amendment, and it is proper under Rule 15. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (“a party may amend its pleading . . . with the opposing party’s consent”). “Once the adverse party has consented to the amendment of a pleading, the court has no control over the matter under Rule 15(a).” Fern v. United States, 213 F.2d 674, 677 (9th Cir. 1954). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulated motion. Defendant PeaceHealth must file the amended answer within 14 days of this order. The amended answer may not differ from the answer attached to the parties’ motion at Docket Number 58. // // // DATED this 27th day of January 2021. A John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. Whatcom County (Cooper v. Whatcom County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.