Cooper v. Wainwright

263 So. 2d 198, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3587
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 24, 1972·No. No. 42215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in the above cause has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied without prejudice to proceed in the trial court to seek, upon proper showing of in-digency, appointment of counsel to represent him in any appellate review including that by way of habeas corpus1 in the First District Court of Appeal, notwithstanding the district court’s sua sponte treatment of petitioner’s pro se assignments of error as a petition for a delayed appeal.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Wainwright, 263 So. 2d 198, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3587 (Fla. 1972).

263 So. 2d 198 (Cooper v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baggett v. Wainwright
229 So. 2d 239 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)