Cooper v. Wade

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 23, 2004·No. 2004-MO-046·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


Teresa Cooper,        Appellant,

v.

James Wade, Jr.,        Respondent.


Appeal From Pickens County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
H. Dean Hall, Circuit Court Judge
John W. Kittredge, Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-046
Heard October 22, 2003 - Filed August 23, 2004


AFFIRMED


Samuel Darryl Harms, of Harms Law Firm, of Greenville, for Appellant.

A.M. Quattlebaum, Jr., of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, and Wes A. Kissinger, of Clarkson, Walsh, Rheney & Turner, both of Greenville, and C. Mitchell Brown, Elizabeth H. Campbell, and Jeffrey S. Patterson, all of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, of Columbia, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 26(b)(1), SCRCP; Hancock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 355 S.C. 398, 584 S.E.2d 398 (Ct. App. 2003); Floe v. Plowden, 10 F.R.D. 504 (E.D.S.C. 1950).

MOORE, A.C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice James W. Johnson, Jr., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Wade, (S.C. 2004).

Cooper v. Wade (Cooper v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hancock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
584 S.E.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003)
Floe v. Plowden
10 F.R.D. 504 (E.D. South Carolina, 1950)