Cooper v. Village of Brockport

246 A.D. 571
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum. While the order in form is one for the examination of witnesses, not parties, they are described as officials of the village-defendant and the purpose of the proposed examination is to elicit information as to knowledge which has no importance except as it constitutes knowledge on the part of the village. A municipality cannot be examined as a party. (Davidson v. City of New York, 221 N. Y. 487; Bush Terminal Co. v. City of New York, 259 id. 509; Greenberg v. City of New York, 235 App. Div. 788; Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co., 238 id. 294.) All concur. (The order granted a motion for the examination of officers of defendant before trial in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of a tree falling on an automobile.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Village of Brockport, 246 A.D. 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 571 (Cooper v. Village of Brockport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ely v. State
204 Misc. 502 (New York State Court of Claims, 1953)
Friedman v. State
161 Misc. 358 (New York State Court of Claims, 1936)