Cooper v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Cooper v. State

2007 WY 15, 150 P.3d 672, 2007 Wyo. LEXIS 14, 2007 WL 188144

CourtWyoming Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 2007

DocketNo. 06-63

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2007 WY 15 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. State, 2007 WY 15, 150 P.3d 672, 2007 Wyo. LEXIS 14, 2007 WL 188144 (Wyo. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE or tHE Disrrircr Court

This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has failed to file a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. On September 20, 2006, appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a "Motion to Withdraw" as counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, [673]*673386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 498 (1967). This Court, after review of the record and the "Anders brief" submitted by counsel, entered, on October 8, 2006, its "Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming the Judgment and Sentence of the District Court." That order provided notice that the district court's "Judgment and Sentence of the Court" would be "affirmed unless, on or before November 17, 2006, appellant file{d] a brief, with points of his choosing, that might arguably support an appeal and persuade this Court that an appeal in this matter is not wholly frivolous." Subsequently, this Court granted two extensions of time to file appellant's pro se brief. On December 13, 2006, this Court entered an "Order Granting Appellant's Request for Extension to File Brief" In that order, this Court granted appellant until January 5, 2007, to file his brief. This Court also ordered that "no further requests for extension of time to file appellant's brief will be considered." Now, taking notice that the appellant, Dana Seott Cooper, has failed to file anything resembling a brief within the time allotted, the Court finds that the judgment and sentence in this matter should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the District Court's "Judgment and Sentence of the Court," which was filed on January 26, 2006, be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

DATED this 24th day of January, 2007.

BY THE COURT:

/a) Barton R. Voigt

BARTON R. VOIGT Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE or tHE Disrrircr Court

This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has failed to file a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. On September 20, 2006, appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a "Motion to Withdraw" as counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, [673]*673386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 498 (1967). This Court, after review of the record and the "Anders brief" submitted by counsel, entered, on October 8, 2006, its "Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming the Judgment and Sentence of the District Court." That order provided notice that the district court's "Judgment and Sentence of the Court" would be "affirmed unless, on or before November 17, 2006, appellant file{d] a brief, with points of his choosing, that might arguably support an appeal and persuade this Court that an appeal in this matter is not wholly frivolous." Subsequently, this Court granted two extensions of time to file appellant's pro se brief. On December 13, 2006, this Court entered an "Order Granting Appellant's Request for Extension to File Brief" In that order, this Court granted appellant until January 5, 2007, to file his brief. This Court also ordered that "no further requests for extension of time to file appellant's brief will be considered." Now, taking notice that the appellant, Dana Seott Cooper, has failed to file anything resembling a brief within the time allotted, the Court finds that the judgment and sentence in this matter should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the District Court's "Judgment and Sentence of the Court," which was filed on January 26, 2006, be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

DATED this 24th day of January, 2007.

BY THE COURT:

/a) Barton R. Voigt

BARTON R. VOIGT Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2007 WY 15, 150 P.3d 672, 2007 Wyo. LEXIS 14, 2007 WL 188144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-wyo-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack