Cooper v. State

447 S.W.2d 179, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 895
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 22, 1969
Docket42002
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 447 S.W.2d 179 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. State, 447 S.W.2d 179, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 895 (Tex. 1969).

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court on January 6, 1967, the appellant was found guilty of the felony offense of driving while intoxicated and his punishment was assessed at a term of five years. Probation was granted.

Among the conditions of his probation was that he commit no offense against the laws of this State.

On' July 22, 1968, the attorney for the state in Midland County filed an amended motion to revoke probation alleging:

“That on or about the 6th day of June, A.D., 1968, in the County of Midland and State of Texas, W. B. D. Cooper (appellant) did unlawfully, willfully, and designedly attempt to produce an abortion on one _ 1 then and there a pregnant woman, by then and there thrusting and forcing into the womb and private parts of the said _, with her consent, a certain instrument calculated to produce an abortion upon her, the said_, against the peace and dignity of the State.”

After a hearing on the state’s motion to revoke, the court entered an order revoking the probation upon a finding that the evidence adduced sustained the allegations of the state’s motion.

For reversal, the appellant urges the following grounds:

“The court erred in revoking appellant’s probation for the reason that the elements of the offense of attempted *180 abortion were not established by the evidence presented in appellant’s revocation hearing.”
“The court erred in revoking appellant’s probation for the reason that there is no evidence that the events presented at the revocation hearing occurred after the appellant was placed on probation.”

On the hearing of the motion, the following evidence was adduced:

The complainant, a female, age 21, with a male companion, age 25, arrived in Midland from Amarillo by automobile about 8 a. m., on June 6, and she first saw the appellant, Dr. Cooper, with whom she had an appointment that day about 9:30 a. m., in his office in Midland.

The complainant testified in part as follows :

“Q Did you talk with Dr. Cooper at that time (9:30 a. m.) ?
“A Yes.
“Q What was the nature of your conversation with him, please, mam ?
“A He asked me how far along I was, and that was it.
“Q Did you answer his questions?
“A Yes.
“Q What did you tell him?
“A I told him that I was 12 weeks and four days.
“Q What happened then?
“A Well, the financial part of the transaction was discussed between him and Mr. _.
“Q Were you present at that time?
“A Yes.
⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜
“Q What happened after the financial arrangements were made, please?
“A I was taken into an examining room.
“Q Was that there at Dr. Cooper’s office?
“A Yes.
“Q All right, and what happened there?
“A His nurse prepared me for whatever was to happen, and she had an assistant with her. And then Dr. Cooper came in and gave me a shot for some reason tq,knock me out.
“Q Do you remember whether the assistant was male or female?
“A Male.
“Q And when you said they prepared you, what do you mean by that?
“A Well, of course, they took all my clothes off, as well as I can remember. They took my skirt off — I had on a skirt and blouse, and put a paper sheet over me, of course, and put my feet up to elevate them.
“Q And then Dr. Cooper was not present at this point?
“A No.
“Q All right, when did you next see Dr. Cooper?
“A When he came in to inject the shot.
“Q Did you have any conversation at that time ?
“A He said something, but I can’t remember what he said.
“Q And Dr. Cooper gave you the shot himself ?
“A Yes.
“Q What happened then?
“A I went to sleep.
“Q When did you wake up?
“A It was approximately about 11 o’clock.
⅝ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ¾£ ⅜
*181 “Q What was your condition at that time ? Was anything changed from the time that you had been given the shot, did you notice any difference?
“A Well, yes, bleeding had started and I was just — well I didn’t notice anything except my stomach and all felt extremely full.
* * * * * *
“Q All right, and then where did you go?
“A To Dr. Cooper’s home.
******
“Q Who took you there ?
“A His nurse.
******
“Q During this period of time, up to that point of time, had you been given any type of medication?
“A When I got up at seven she gave me a pill, a little white pill.
“Q Had there been any dressing or any medication in that regard?
“A No.
* * * * * *
“Q And when did you next see Dr. Cooper ?
“A * * * i saw Dr. Cooper the next morning.
“O And where was that? was that still in his home?
“A Yes.
“Q And about what time was that, do you recall?
“A Approximately eight o’clock.
“O And what transpired at that time?
“A Well, I was informed that I was being taken home, and first of all I would need to go to Dr. Cooper’s office for him to remove packing from me, and we left, his nurse, and some other man was there, and Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. Texas Board of Medical Examiners
489 S.W.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Kelly v. State
483 S.W.2d 467 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Hill v. State
480 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Terry v. State
468 S.W.2d 849 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 S.W.2d 179, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-texcrimapp-1969.