Cooper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cooper v. State

172 S.W.2d 95, 146 Tex. Crim. 107, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 495

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 9, 1943

DocketNo. 22553

StatusPublished

This text of 172 S.W.2d 95 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. State, 172 S.W.2d 95, 146 Tex. Crim. 107, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 495 (Tex. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

It indefinitely appears from the record that appellant had been assessed a fine of $100.00 for some violation of the liquor laws by the county court of Wilbarger County.

We are unable to find grounds for jurisdiction in this court to consider whatever question might have been in the mind of appellant. In the first place, the record before us shows that some procedure was had in the county in vacation. This appears to be a motion in arrest of judgment which was not presented at the time and manner provided by law — Article 2232 Vernon’s Ann. Civ. S. with annotations. Again it is shown that the record was mailed to this court by the attorney representing the appellant. This court will receive records only from the clerk of the trial court, consequently the case is not properly before us for consideration — Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. Art. 843 and annotations thereunder.

The State has filed motion to dismiss the appeal which, for the foregoing reasons, will be granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

It indefinitely appears from the record that appellant had been assessed a fine of $100.00 for some violation of the liquor laws by the county court of Wilbarger County.

We are unable to find grounds for jurisdiction in this court to consider whatever question might have been in the mind of appellant. In the first place, the record before us shows that some procedure was had in the county in vacation. This appears to be a motion in arrest of judgment which was not presented at the time and manner provided by law — Article 2232 Vernon’s Ann. Civ. S. with annotations. Again it is shown that the record was mailed to this court by the attorney representing the appellant. This court will receive records only from the clerk of the trial court, consequently the case is not properly before us for consideration — Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. Art. 843 and annotations thereunder.

The State has filed motion to dismiss the appeal which, for the foregoing reasons, will be granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 S.W.2d 95, 146 Tex. Crim. 107, 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-texcrimapp-1943.