Cooper v. State
This text of 46 S.W.2d 696 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record seems to have reference to a bond forfeiture.
The transcript contains the following: An indictment against V. E. Cooper, an appearance bond which purports to have been executed by him as principal, and by Mayr and O’Connor as sureties; a scire facias citation, and an alias scire facias citation, in which it is recited that a judgment nisi forfeiting the bond had been taken; the answer of the sureties ; and the certificate of the clerk that the foregoing was a full, true, and correct transcript of the proceedings. The transcript does not contain a judgment nisi, nor any judgment making the forfeiture final. There appears no notice of appeal. If, indeed, nothing else transpired than as shown from the transcript, there was nothing to appeal from. We cannot dismiss the. appeal because none appears to have been taken.
The cause is ordered stricken from the docket.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 S.W.2d 696, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.