Cooper v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cooper v. State

518 S.W.3d 286, 2017 WL 2118616, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 427

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 2017·No. No. ED 104315·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James B. Cooper appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary healing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James B. Cooper appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary healing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Cooper v. State, 518 S.W.3d 286, 2017 WL 2118616, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

518 S.W.3d 286 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.