Cooper v. State

213 S.W.3d 149, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1987, 2006 WL 3782937
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2006·No. ED 88073·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Cooper (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to class B felony of robbery in the second degree. He was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. State, 213 S.W.3d 149, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1987, 2006 WL 3782937 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

213 S.W.3d 149 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Self v. Brunson
213 S.W.3d 149 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)