Cooper v. State
This text of 46 Ind. 379 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a prosecution against the appellant for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. Conviction.
The only question raised in the case is, whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
There was evidence introduced which was clearly sufficient. But there was evidence which was in conflict with it, and tended strongly to show that the defendant was innocent. The jury weighed it, and in accordance with the long established practice, we cannot disturb the conclusion arrived, at by the jury.
The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Ind. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-ind-1874.