Cooper v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cooper v. State

100 S.E. 726, 24 Ga. App. 376, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 677

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 6, 1919

Docket10717

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 726 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. State, 100 S.E. 726, 24 Ga. App. 376, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 677 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, ,T.

Grounds of a motion for a new trial which are not approved by the trial court can not he considered by this court.

(a) There is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of motion for a new trial which have the approval of the trial judge

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodwortíi, J., concur.

Indictment for burglary; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. May 24, 1919.

Sidney W. Hatcher, for plaintiff in error. John P. Boss, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI