Cooper v. State
This text of 175 S.E.2d 653 (Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marvin Joe Cooper and Archie Kerry Cooper appeal their convictions for robbery by the use of an offensive weapon. Held:
1. Enumerations of error 1, 3 and 4 complaining that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict are without merit. Both defendants confessed to the crime and the corpus delicti was proved. In addition, a police officer, who observed the defendants in the commission of the robbery and gave chase, identified them.
2. Enumeration of error 2 complaining that the defendant Marvin Joe Cooper was denied counsel at the time of his confession is without merit. The record shows that he voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to counsel after [435]*435having been given the warnings prescribed by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 473 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694, 10 ALR3d 974).
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.E.2d 653, 226 Ga. 434, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-state-ga-1970.