Cooper v. State

638 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149, 1994 WL 275832
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1994·No. Nos. 93-933, 93-932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No reversible error has been demonstrated in the trial proceedings which culminated [201]*201in the convictions entered below. Specifically, we find no deficiency in the standard Miranda rights form utilized by the Metro-Dade Police Department, see California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981), and that, in the light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any arguable error in the admission of evidence or the argument of the prosecutor was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). We do agree that the formal judgments entered against the defendants should be corrected to reflect that the charges contained in count V were dismissed on motion of the state.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. State, 638 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149, 1994 WL 275832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

638 So. 2d 200 (Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gillis v. State
930 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Johnson v. State
750 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)