Cooper v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cooper v. Smith

99 A.D.2d 644, 471 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 644 (Cooper v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. Smith, 99 A.D.2d 644, 471 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging petitioner’s removal from a prison job assignment without a disciplinary hearing, Special Term correctly held that such a hearing was not required. Petitioner had no statutory guarantee that he would keep his kitchen job and prison officials could remove him from that assignment at any time without a hearing (Matter of Duval v Smith, 50 AD2d 1066,1067). It is additionally noted that transfer from one job to another is not one of the permitted dispositions at either a violation hearing or a disciplinary hearing (see 7 NYCRR 252.5,253.7,254.7). Thus, respondent’s conduct did not amount to disciplinary action. Therefore, the court erred in directing that petitioner be compensated from the time his assignment was terminated to the date of reassignment to a new job at the rate of pay he was earning at the time of his termination. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Doyle, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging petitioner’s removal from a prison job assignment without a disciplinary hearing, Special Term correctly held that such a hearing was not required. Petitioner had no statutory guarantee that he would keep his kitchen job and prison officials could remove him from that assignment at any time without a hearing (Matter of Duval v Smith, 50 AD2d 1066,1067). It is additionally noted that transfer from one job to another is not one of the permitted dispositions at either a violation hearing or a disciplinary hearing (see 7 NYCRR 252.5,253.7,254.7). Thus, respondent’s conduct did not amount to disciplinary action. Therefore, the court erred in directing that petitioner be compensated from the time his assignment was terminated to the date of reassignment to a new job at the rate of pay he was earning at the time of his termination. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Doyle, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 644, 471 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-smith-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack