Cooper v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Cooper v. Smith

486 F. App'x 344

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. 12-7367·Published

Opinion

[345] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. Smith, No. 5:11-cv-00755-CMC, 2012 WL 2935396 (D.S.C. July 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[345] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. Smith, No. 5:11-cv-00755-CMC, 2012 WL 2935396 (D.S.C. July 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cooper v. Smith, 486 F. App'x 344 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

486 F. App'x 344 (Cooper v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related