Cooper v. Roberts
16 N.J.L. 353
Opinion
This case differs from that of Ross v. Ward. In that, the summons was unmeaning and unintelligible. The use of figures is not fatal. But the second objection is well taken. On that ground let the judgment be.
Reversed.
Cited in Gardner v. Small, 2 Harr. 163.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper v. Roberts, 16 N.J.L. 353 (N.J. 1838).
16 N.J.L. 353 (Cooper v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.