Cooper v. Roberts

16 N.J.L. 353
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.J.L. 353 (Cooper v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. Roberts, 16 N.J.L. 353 (N.J. 1838).

Opinion

By the Court.

This case differs from that of Ross v. Ward. In that, the summons was unmeaning and unintelligible. The use of figures is not fatal. But the second objection is well taken. On that ground let the judgment be.

Reversed.

Cited in Gardner v. Small, 2 Harr. 163.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.J.L. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-roberts-nj-1838.